Descartes' Philosophy of Science

Descartes' Philosophy of Science
Author :
Publisher : Manchester University Press
Total Pages : 272
Release :
ISBN-10 : 0719008689
ISBN-13 : 9780719008689
Rating : 4/5 (89 Downloads)

Book Synopsis Descartes' Philosophy of Science by : Desmond M. Clarke

Download or read book Descartes' Philosophy of Science written by Desmond M. Clarke and published by Manchester University Press. This book was released on 1982 with total page 272 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt:


Descartes' Philosophy of Science Related Books

Descartes' Philosophy of Science
Language: en
Pages: 272
Authors: Desmond M. Clarke
Categories: Philosophy
Type: BOOK - Published: 1982 - Publisher: Manchester University Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Essays on the Philosophy and Science of René Descartes
Language: en
Pages: 361
Authors: Stephen Voss
Categories: Philosophy
Type: BOOK - Published: 1993 - Publisher: Oxford University Press, USA

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

In English, with some essays translated from French. Includes bibliographical references and index.
Descartes Embodied
Language: en
Pages: 354
Authors: Daniel Garber
Categories: Philosophy
Type: BOOK - Published: 2001 - Publisher: Cambridge University Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

A central theme unifying the essays in this volume on the work of Descartes is the interconnection between Descartes' philosophical and scientific interests, an
Descartes' Metaphysical Physics
Language: en
Pages: 416
Authors: Daniel Garber
Categories: Philosophy
Type: BOOK - Published: 1992-05 - Publisher: University of Chicago Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

In this first book-length treatment of Descartes' important and influential natural philosophy, Daniel Garber is principally concerned with Descartes' accounts
Descartes and the Enlightenment
Language: en
Pages: 207
Authors: Peter A. Schouls
Categories: Philosophy
Type: BOOK - Published: 1989-02-01 - Publisher: McGill-Queen's Press - MQUP

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Schouls limits himself to a discussion of these three concepts in order to escape facile and vague generalizations. For the same reason, in relating Descartes t