Environmental Guilt and Shame

Environmental Guilt and Shame
Author :
Publisher : Oxford University Press
Total Pages : 330
Release :
ISBN-10 : 9780192580351
ISBN-13 : 0192580353
Rating : 4/5 (51 Downloads)

Book Synopsis Environmental Guilt and Shame by : Sarah E. Fredericks

Download or read book Environmental Guilt and Shame written by Sarah E. Fredericks and published by Oxford University Press. This book was released on 2021-06-09 with total page 330 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: Bloggers confessing that they waste food, non-governmental organizations naming corporations selling unsustainably harvested seafood, and veterans apologizing to Native Americans at the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation for environmental and social devastation caused by the United States government all signal the existence of action-oriented guilt and identity-oriented shame about participation in environmental degradation. Environmental Guilt and Shame demonstrates that these moral emotions are common among environmentally friendly segments of the United States but have received little attention from environmental ethicists though they can catalyze or hinder environmental action. Concern about environmental guilt and shame among “everyday environmentalists” reveals the practical, emotional, ethical, and existential issues raised by environmental guilt and shame and ethical insights about guilt, shame, responsibility, agency, and identity. A typology of guilt and shame enables the development and evaluation of these ethical insights. Environmental Guilt and Shame makes three major claims: first, individuals and collectives, including the diffuse collectives that cause climate change, can have identity, agency, and responsibility and thus guilt and shame. Second, some agents, including collectives, should feel guilt and/or shame for environmental degradation if they hold environmental values and think that their actions shape and reveal their identity. Third, a number of conditions are required to conceptually, existentially, and practically deal with guilt and shame's effects on agents. These conditions can be developed and maintained through rituals. Existing rituals need more development to fully deal with individual and collective guilt and shame as well as the anthropogenic environmental degradation that may spark them.


Environmental Guilt and Shame Related Books

Environmental Guilt and Shame
Language: en
Pages: 330
Authors: Sarah E. Fredericks
Categories: Religion
Type: BOOK - Published: 2021-06-09 - Publisher: Oxford University Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Bloggers confessing that they waste food, non-governmental organizations naming corporations selling unsustainably harvested seafood, and veterans apologizing t
Ecologies of Guilt in Environmental Rhetorics
Language: en
Pages: 168
Authors: Tim Jensen
Categories: Social Science
Type: BOOK - Published: 2019-10-28 - Publisher: Springer Nature

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Environmental rhetorics have expanded awareness of mass extinction, climate change, and pervasive pollution, yet failed to generate collective action that adequ
Is Shame Necessary?
Language: en
Pages: 226
Authors: Jennifer Jacquet
Categories: Science
Type: BOOK - Published: 2016-01-12 - Publisher: Vintage

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

An urgent, illuminating exploration of the social nature of shame and of how it might be used to promote large-scale political change and social reform. “[Jac
Shame and Guilt
Language: en
Pages: 292
Authors: June Price Tangney
Categories: Psychology
Type: BOOK - Published: 2003-11-01 - Publisher: Guilford Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

This volume reports on the growing body of knowledge on shame and guilt, integrating findings from the authors' original research program with other data emergi
Measuring and Evaluating Sustainability
Language: en
Pages: 261
Authors: Sarah E. Fredericks
Categories: Business & Economics
Type: BOOK - Published: 2013-08-15 - Publisher: Routledge

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The indexes used by local, national, and international governments to monitor progress toward sustainability do not adequately align with their ethical prioriti