Making Law and Courts Research Relevant

Making Law and Courts Research Relevant
Author :
Publisher : Routledge
Total Pages : 281
Release :
ISBN-10 : 9781317693451
ISBN-13 : 1317693450
Rating : 4/5 (51 Downloads)

Book Synopsis Making Law and Courts Research Relevant by : Brandon L. Bartels

Download or read book Making Law and Courts Research Relevant written by Brandon L. Bartels and published by Routledge. This book was released on 2014-09-04 with total page 281 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: One of the more enduring topics of concern for empirically-oriented scholars of law and courts—and political scientists more generally—is how research can be more directly relevant to broader audiences outside of academia. A significant part of this issue goes back to a seeming disconnect between empirical and normative scholars of law and courts that has increased in recent years. Brandon L. Bartels and Chris W. Bonneau argue that being attuned to the normative implications of one’s work enhances the quality of empirical work, not to mention makes it substantially more interesting to both academics and non-academic practitioners. Their book’s mission is to examine how the normative implications of empirical work in law and courts can be more visible and relevant to audiences beyond academia. Written by scholars of political science, law, and sociology, the chapters in the volume offer ideas on a methodology for communicating normative implications in a balanced, nuanced, and modest manner. The contributors argue that if empirical work is strongly suggestive of certain policy or institutional changes, scholars should make those implications known so that information can be diffused. The volume consists of four sections that respectively address the general enterprise of developing normative implications of empirical research, law and decisionmaking, judicial selection, and courts in the broader political and societal context. This volume represents the start of a conversation on the topic of how the normative implications of empirical research in law and courts can be made more visible. This book will primarily interest scholars of law and courts, as well as students of judicial politics. Other subfields of political science engaging in empirical research will also find the suggestions made in the book relevant.


Making Law and Courts Research Relevant Related Books

Making Law and Courts Research Relevant
Language: en
Pages: 281
Authors: Brandon L. Bartels
Categories: Political Science
Type: BOOK - Published: 2014-09-04 - Publisher: Routledge

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

One of the more enduring topics of concern for empirically-oriented scholars of law and courts—and political scientists more generally—is how research can b
Making Law and Courts Research Relevant
Language: en
Pages: 261
Authors: Brandon L. Bartels
Categories: Political Science
Type: BOOK - Published: 2014-09-04 - Publisher: Routledge

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

One of the more enduring topics of concern for empirically-oriented scholars of law and courts—and political scientists more generally—is how research can b
Opposing the Rule of Law
Language: en
Pages: 337
Authors: Nick Cheesman
Categories: History
Type: BOOK - Published: 2015-03-12 - Publisher: Cambridge University Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

A striking new analysis of Myanmar's court system, revealing how the rule of law is 'lexically present but semantically absent'.
The Constrained Court
Language: en
Pages: 232
Authors: Michael A. Bailey
Categories: Law
Type: BOOK - Published: 2011-08-22 - Publisher: Princeton University Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

How do Supreme Court justices decide their cases? Do they follow their policy preferences? Or are they constrained by the law and by other political actors? The
Research Handbook on Law and Courts
Language: en
Pages: 505
Authors: Susan M. Sterett
Categories: Law
Type: BOOK - Published: 2019 - Publisher: Edward Elgar Publishing

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The Research Handbook on Law and Courts provides a systematic analysis of new work on courts as governing institutions. Authors consider how courts have taken o