A Free Discussion of the Doctrine of Materialism, and Philosophical Necessity

A Free Discussion of the Doctrine of Materialism, and Philosophical Necessity
Author :
Publisher : London : Printed for J. Johnson
Total Pages : 552
Release :
ISBN-10 : PRNC:32101068788155
ISBN-13 :
Rating : 4/5 (55 Downloads)

Book Synopsis A Free Discussion of the Doctrine of Materialism, and Philosophical Necessity by : Richard Price

Download or read book A Free Discussion of the Doctrine of Materialism, and Philosophical Necessity written by Richard Price and published by London : Printed for J. Johnson. This book was released on 1778 with total page 552 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt:


A Free Discussion of the Doctrine of Materialism, and Philosophical Necessity Related Books

A Free Discussion of the Doctrine of Materialism, and Philosophical Necessity
Language: en
Pages: 552
Authors: Richard Price
Categories: Free will and determinism
Type: BOOK - Published: 1778 - Publisher: London : Printed for J. Johnson

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

A Free Discussion of the Doctrines of Materialism and Philosophical Necessity
Language: en
Pages: 428
Authors: Joseph Priestley
Categories: Free will and determinism
Type: BOOK - Published: 1994 - Publisher: Burns & Oates

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The Free Discussion between Richard Price and Joseph Priestley (1778) originated as a correspondence between the two after the publication of Priestley's Disqui
The Enlightened Joseph Priestley
Language: en
Pages: 480
Authors: Robert E. Schofield
Categories: History
Type: BOOK - Published: 2010-11 - Publisher: Penn State Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Joseph Priestley (1733-1804) is one of the major figures of the English Enlightenment. A contemporary and friend of Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Jefferson, he e
The Riddle of Hume's Treatise
Language: en
Pages: 444
Authors: Paul Russell
Categories: Language Arts & Disciplines
Type: BOOK - Published: 2010-06-15 - Publisher: Oxford University Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

It is widely held that Hume's Treatise has little or nothing to do with problems of religion. Contrary to this view, Paul Russell argues that it is irreligious