The Human Gene Editing Debate

The Human Gene Editing Debate
Author :
Publisher : Oxford University Press
Total Pages : 288
Release :
ISBN-10 : 9780197519585
ISBN-13 : 019751958X
Rating : 4/5 (85 Downloads)

Book Synopsis The Human Gene Editing Debate by : John H. Evans

Download or read book The Human Gene Editing Debate written by John H. Evans and published by Oxford University Press. This book was released on 2020-08-19 with total page 288 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: In 2018 the first genetically modified babies were reportedly born in China, made possible by the invention of CRISPR technology in 2012. This controversial advancement overturned the pre-existing moral consensus, which had held for over fifty years before: while gene editing an adult person was morally acceptable, modifying babies, and thus subsequent generations, crossed a significant moral line. If this line is passed over, scientists will be left without an agreed-upon ethical limit. What do we do now? John H. Evans here provides a meta-level guide to how these debates move forward and their significance to society. He explains how the bioethical debate has long been characterized as a slippery slope, with consensually ethical use at the top, nightmarish dystopia at the bottom, and specific agreed-upon limits in between, which draw the lines between the ethical and the unethical. Evans frames his analysis around these limits, or barriers. Historically they have existed to guide scientists and to prevent the debate from slipping down the metaphorical slope into unacceptable eugenicist possibilities, such as in Aldous Huxley's novel Brave New World or the movie Gattaca. Evans examines the history of how barriers were placed, then fell, then replaced by new ones, and discusses how these insights inform where the debate may head. He evaluates other proposed barriers relevant to where we are now, projects that most of the barriers suggested by scientists and bioethicists will not hold, and cautiously identifies a few that could serve as the moral boundary for the next generation. At a critical time in this new era of intervention in the human genome, The Human Gene Editing Debate provides a necessary, comprehensive analysis of the conversation's direction, past, present, and future.


The Human Gene Editing Debate Related Books

The Human Gene Editing Debate
Language: en
Pages: 288
Authors: John H. Evans
Categories: Science
Type: BOOK - Published: 2020-08-19 - Publisher: Oxford University Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

In 2018 the first genetically modified babies were reportedly born in China, made possible by the invention of CRISPR technology in 2012. This controversial adv
Human Genome Editing
Language: en
Pages: 329
Authors: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
Categories: Medical
Type: BOOK - Published: 2017-08-13 - Publisher: National Academies Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Genome editing is a powerful new tool for making precise alterations to an organism's genetic material. Recent scientific advances have made genome editing more
Heritable Human Genome Editing
Language: en
Pages: 239
Authors: The Royal Society
Categories: Medical
Type: BOOK - Published: 2021-01-16 - Publisher: National Academies Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Heritable human genome editing - making changes to the genetic material of eggs, sperm, or any cells that lead to their development, including the cells of earl
The Human Gene Editing Debate
Language: en
Pages: 288
Authors: John H. Evans
Categories: Science
Type: BOOK - Published: 2020-08-19 - Publisher: Oxford University Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

In 2018 the first genetically modified babies were reportedly born in China, made possible by the invention of CRISPR technology in 2012. This controversial adv
Altered Inheritance
Language: en
Pages: 305
Authors: Françoise Baylis
Categories: Science
Type: BOOK - Published: 2019-09-17 - Publisher: Harvard University Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

With the advent of CRISPR gene-editing technology, designer babies have become a reality. Françoise Baylis insists that scientists alone cannot decide the term